Click to see the details
history
Name | 6427 |
Family | Oyster Royal |
Grade | Precision |
Gender | Unisex |
Movement | Rolex 1210 (Details) |
Years in Production | 1959 |
Case Diameter (mm) | 34 |
Mechanism | Manual |
Chronometer | No |
Hacking | No |
Date Function | No |
Quickset | No |
Chronograph | No |
Power Reserve (Hours) | 58 |
Frequency (bph) | 18, 000 |
Jewel Count | 17 |
Crown Position | 3 O'Clock |
Crystal Material | Acrylic |
Band Replaceable | Yes |
Notes:
The Precision line offered manually-wound watches when Rolex was primarily known for its automatic caliber. This fact helps to explain the lack of attention that the line got, although Rolex non-automatic calibers also possessed reliability and offered significant power reserve. Manual calibers from Rolex also allow for a thinner Oyster case, which matches perfectly with the original riveted bracelet. Among the Precision line, the most popular model was undoubtedly the 34mm no-date; here we have the rarer 6427 reference, coming with an uncommon ridged bezel. The stunning leaf hands and the cream dial certainly live up to the Royal moniker.
Mechanism:
This calibre dates from the mid 1950s. The calibre 1210 was one of the many derivations of the old Hunter 10½ movement, which dated back to the 1920s. The 1210 was one of the last of these manual wind movements, unlike the original 10½ movement it features shock protection on the balance & escape pivots. These movements usually feature 17 jewels, and were used in the 3038 series of 'Pre-Cellini' watches.
The 1210 is the sister to the 1215, with the primary difference being that the 1215 has a date feature where the 1210 does not.
The 1210 is the sister to the 1215, with the primary difference being that the 1215 has a date feature where the 1210 does not.
Item created by: gdm
on 2018-10-08 19:04:48
Last edited by: gdm on 2018-10-08 19:05:36
If you see errors or missing data in this entry, please feel free to log in and edit it. Anyone with a Gmail account can log in instantly.
Last edited by: gdm on 2018-10-08 19:05:36
If you see errors or missing data in this entry, please feel free to log in and edit it. Anyone with a Gmail account can log in instantly.